The evidence in a case demonstrates whether a crime has been committed, serves to keep criminals off the streets, and helps bring closure to victims and family members. Therefore, when evidence tampering occurs, it can result in a severe miscarriage of justice. A guilty party may be allowed to go free as a result, while an innocent party could go to prison for something he or she did not do. When discovered or suspected, tampering with evidence may warrant its own, separate charges. Hiring a private investigator can help uncover cases of evidence tampering.

What is Evidence?

Any record, object, or document useful to a criminal inquiry or investigation can be considered evidence. This includes tangible objects, such as drugs, weapons, and clothing. It also includes records that exist only in digital form, which may include documents, videos, photographs, etc.

Not all evidence is admissible in court. There are rules that govern what the prosecution can or cannot introduce as evidence during a criminal trial. For example, evidence that was obtained by illegal means cannot be admitted.

What Is Tampering With Evidence?

Tampering with evidence can take one of two forms. It can involve concealing, removing, destroying or changing something significant to the investigation so it cannot be used during a trial. It can also involve using, producing or presenting evidence that one knows to be false in the interest of misleading those involved in the investigation and legal proceedings.

Evidence tampering is usually carried out in the hopes of avoiding legal consequences by either concealing the fact that a crime has taken place, obscuring one’s role in it, or trying to frame someone else for the offense.

It should be noted that knowledge and intent are necessary to prove a charge of tampering. If evidence is destroyed or altered due to an accident or neglect, that does not necessarily constitute tampering, although it may carry its own consequences. Similarly, if you were to destroy evidence without knowledge that it might be significant to a criminal investigation, the law would probably not regard that as tampering.

For example, if an office worker destroyed financial records as a routine job task without knowing that they might be significant to an investigation into possible fraud, that would not be considered tampering. However, if you were to flush drugs down the toilet as the police were at the door, that would likely incur a tampering charge if discovered.

Who Could Commit Evidence Tampering?

Ordinary citizens may tamper with evidence to avoid being investigated and/or prosecuted for a crime. This may be what you think of when you hear about tampering because of its frequent depiction in popular forms of fictional entertainment.

Unfortunately, however, it is fairly common for law enforcement officers to tamper with evidence. This can take many forms. It may involve planting an object or material, such as drugs or weapons, at the scene during an investigation in order to incriminate someone who may not have been involved in the suspected crime. It can also involve altering or destroying evidence, such as body cam or dash cam footage, that demonstrates misconduct by law enforcement officers. A more complex situation occurs when the footage is recorded not by law enforcement devices but by civilian observers, and the officers involved confiscate the video or photographs by force.

Sometimes prosecutors and law enforcement officers have the same objective of obtaining a conviction, by any means necessary, for an individual charged with a crime. When this happens, they will sometimes work together to falsify or alter the evidence toward that end.

Who Does Evidence Tampering Hurt?

Many people can be negatively affected by someone tampering with evidence. Examples include the following:

  • An Innocent Person Wrongly Convicted: Because of someone else’s efforts to incriminate you, you could serve prison time for a crime you didn’t commit.
  • Crime Victims and Family Members: If you or a loved one suffered as a result of a crime, tampering could prevent you from seeing justice prevail and gaining closure.
  • The General Public: If a guilty party goes free because of tampering, he or she could commit similar crimes in the future, posing a threat to the public.
  • The Criminal Justice System: When tampering is committed by law enforcement and/or prosecutors, it undermines the public faith in the system, making it more difficult for honest officials to do their jobs effectively.

What Are the Consequences of Evidence Tampering?

Tampering is considered a separate charge from obstruction of justice. However, since the purpose of tampering is often to change the outcome of a criminal proceeding, charges of tampering and obstruction often coincide with one other.

Depending on the seriousness of the case and other factors, a person accused of tampering may be charged with either a felony or a misdemeanor. A person charged and convicted of tampering may be incarcerated for up to 20 years for a felony charge, or for as little as one year for a misdemeanor. The court may also impose fines that could amount to thousands of dollars.

 

Summary
What Is Tampering With Evidence?
Article Name
What Is Tampering With Evidence?
Description
The term 'tampering with evidence' is generally thrown about in courtrooms as well as in popular crime busting movies and TV shows. The term itself refers to a criminal offense where a person is involved in an act of altering, concealing, falsifying, or destroying crucial evidence with the intention of misleading an investigation being conducted by law enforcement agencies, governments or regulatory bodies. Being a criminal offense, the act is punishable by law in most jurisdictions across the country and the world. In many instances, tampering with evidence is seen as a form of obstruction of justice. Many people who are charged with tampering with evidence are also charged with obstruction of justice as well. This should not come as a surprise because the main objective of tampering with evidence is usually to cover up a crime that has already been committed. Attempting to cover up a crime directly translates to perverting the course of justice. However, ordinary citizens are not the only people who can be charged with the crime of tampering with evidence. In recent times, law enforcement officers have also found themselves being prosecuted under the same charges. Police officers have in the past being accused of tampering with civilian evidence as well as evidence proving police misconduct such as audio and video recordings. Such acts of altering or destroying evidence by police officers can are also seen as tampering with evidence. More and more people are finding themselves being victims of this criminal offense. When a person be it a civilian or a law enforcement officer tampers with evidence, numerous individuals may suffer in various ways such as failure to get justice as well as wrongful conviction. When a crime cannot be proved due to lack of evidence, justice cannot prevail. Criminals are therefore not prosecuted as they should be and their victims are left to suffer. This should not be allowed to happen. Police officers have also been known to lose crucial evidence necessary to convict criminals. These acts are also acts of tampering with evidence. Law enforcement officers may also collude with prosecution officers in court to alter or falsify evidence to their benefit. This is an illegal act which is also punishable by law. Anyone who may feel like they are a victim of this criminal offense should take up the necessary legal measures to ensure that their rights and freedoms are not violated.
Author
Publisher Name
Private Investigator NYC - Beau Dietl & Associates
Publisher Logo